Sunday, February 28, 2016

My Favorite Films: A Man for All Seasons (Lent Reviews Week 2)

"More is a man of an angel's wit and singular learning. I know not his fellow. For where is the man of that gentleness, lowliness and affability? And, as time requireth, a man of marvelous mirth and pastimes, and sometime of as sad gravity. A man for all seasons."
- Robert Whittington on Thomas More



     I first saw A Man for All Seasons when I was a young man and it left an immediate impression on me. I was inspired by Thomas More's steadfast moral conviction. Over the years I've begun to appreciate how complex this film is and to appreciate it more and more.

     This film has, quite possibly, my favorite screenplay ever. It was written by Robert Bolt, who adapted it from his own successful play of the same name. It's thematically rich, so much so that I notice new themes and complexities every time I watch it. In my most recent viewing I noticed how it comments on the corruption in the church and in English politics at the time. For instance it is emphasized how rare a lawyer Thomas More was for not accepting bribes. Thomas' son in law William Roper often complains of church corruption and More doesn't really object to these complaints, only that Roper is, initially, a heretic, following the teachings of Martin Luther. But these ideas are only scratching the surface. The film deals, mainly with the significance of words in laws and oaths, and with themes of personal conscious and integrity in the face of institutional corruption.


     There is much discussion in the film about words and the letter of the law. When Roper suggest that More should try to have Richard Rich imprisoned for duplicity, More counters that Rich has done nothing illegal. He must respect the law even when it protects the wicked along with the innocent, because society is built upon laws. If you ignore them or tear them down society will crumble.

     Thomas More himself is portrayed as a very morally complex character, one who will avoid confronting corruption if he can but will never betray his conscious or his principles. When Parliament proclaims King Henry as supreme head of the Church in England, Thomas resigns his post as Lord Chancellor in order to avoid controversy. And when the Act of Succession is passed, which requires all Englishman to take an oath recognizing Henry and Anne as the legitimate heirs to the throne, and repudiating the pope's authority in this manner,  he at first holds out a hope that he may be able to take it if the wording is sufficiently vague. He tells his daughter, "If he suffers us to come to such a case that there is no escaping...then we can clamour like champions, if we have the spittle for it. But it's God's part to bring ourselves to such a pass. Our natural business lies in escaping."

     Ultimately though, More cannot escape and when his daughter tries to convince him to take the oath saying that God values the thoughts of the heart more than the words of the mouth he replies, "When a man takes an oath, he's holding his own self in his own hands, like water. And if he opens his fingers then, he needn't hope to find himself again."  An oath is made up of words but it amounts to something much more grave.





     Besides the awesome screenplay there are many other things I love about this film. Director Fred Zinnemann was known for his meticulous attention to detail and historical accuracy which is very apparent in all aspects of this film. Ted Moore's elegant cinematography really helps to put the viewer in the 16th century England, at times evoking contemporary art, George Delerue's score also goes a long way in invoking the period, drawing largely form the antiphonal music of the time, and the costume and set design are equally magnificent.


     I would be amiss not to mention the performances. All the supporting players do an excellent job from Robert Shaw's almost bipolar performance as Henry VIII to John Hurt's pitiful, sleazy portrayal of Richard Rich. Wendy Hiller, Susanah York, and Nigel Davenport are really sell the unique personalities of Thomas' wife Alice, his daughter Margaret, and his son-in-law Roper respectively. But it's Paul Scofield's Thomas More (a role he also played on stage) who effortlessly carries the film on his shoulders, giving a really subtle and complex performance of a very well written and fleshed out character. Fred Zinnemann insisted on casting him despite the producers reluctance and it's hard for me to imagine anyone else in the role. Showing uncanny wit and great strength of character with an undercurrent of vulnerability, Scofileds's More truly is a man for all seasons.

     Combining a great screenplay with awesome production design and really solid performances A Man for All Seasons is easily one of my favorite films of all time.




Sunday, February 21, 2016

Lent Reviews Year 3 Week 1: Bernadette

Here we go again...

Bernadette is a 1988 French film directed by Jean Delannoy. It tells the story of St. Bernadette Soubirous (Sydney Penny) and the miraculous apparition of Our Lady to her at Lourdes, France.

It is interesting to compare this film to The Song of Bernadette which I reviewed last year. This film is more historically accurate and also less dialog driven, preferring to let the simplicity of the story speak for itself instead of using it to explore issues of faith and rationality as the King film did. It's also less comprehensive. Where Song covered her life in the convent and her death after a long-term illness, this film ends with her entering the convent, leaving the rest of the story for a sequel, The Passion of Bernadette. On the other hand this film gives a little more insight into the political background than the King film did. The authorities in Lourdes, being republicans, are shown to be initially afraid that the apparitions are a royalist scheme. Perhaps the main reason for these differences is that The Song of Bernadette was based on a novel, while this movie is based simply on the historical account of the story, which the director Jean Delannoy wanted to follow as closely as possible.


Because of this historically accurate approach, and perhaps also due to budgetary constraints, the movie has a fairly realistic tone and minimalist style. The Blessed Virgin is never seen, only Bernadette's transfixed reaction to her. This is what impresses me most about the film. It allows the viewers to judge the truth of the events largely by themselves.

The cinematography is restrained and unobtrusive as, again, Delonnoy prefers to let the events speak for themselves. The acting is generally strong from Sydney Penny's forthright, humble portrayal of Bernadette to Jean-Marc Bory's ill tempered and firm-but-kind, Father Peyramale. The score, though clearly low budget, effectively evokes the mysterious aura of the apparitions and miracles. 

The film is not without problems. The pacing is sporadic at times and there are characters and subplots that feel underdeveloped. But overall I really appreciate the directors restrained, reverential approach to the story and would certainly recommend this film to any one interested in the Lourdes apparitions.

Score: 8.5/10


Tuesday, February 9, 2016

Update: Youtube videos and the return of Lent Reviews!

I haven't posted in a while. I've been busy with Christmas and school (and the flu season :P). Lent is upon us once again and I'll be posting (or trying to at least) my usual weekly religious film reviews between now and Easter. Expect the first one some time next week.

On another note I've been helping my brother build up his youtube channel theBrotherThre3. To tide you over ;) and make up for lost time here are some reviews I've participated in one there over the last month or so. WARNING: The Sin City review contains some (very little) profanity (as well as some Frank Miller bashing from yours truly).

Star Wars: The Force Awakens
 
The Hateful Eight

Sin City