Thursday, January 6, 2022

My Favorite Films: It's a Wonderful Life (1946)

 “I would rather be what God chose to make me than the most glorious creature that I could think of; for to have been thought about, born in God's thought, and then made by God, is the dearest, grandest and most precious thing in all thinking.” 

― George MacDonald

     It's a Wonderful Life is my favorite film of all time. Because of this, the idea of reviewing it has always intimidated me. It's an incredibly rich film. Every time I watch it (an annual Christmas tradition in my home) I glean some new insight from it. On the other hand, it's also a film that has become so ingrained in the culture that one fears having nothing new to say. With that said, though I feel a little like George Bailey sitting in Mr. Potter's chair, I think I have finally reached a point where I am ready to take a crack at it.


     Much has been made of the films social commentary and this is what most attracted me to it in my college years. The film champions communitarian values. The people of Bedford Falls are bound together by both George and his father, who, through their service to the community, emerge as leaders of it, even if they are never formally recognized as such. In contrast to this, Mr. Potter's authority in the community arises from his exploitation of it. He offers them quick answers while the Bailey's encourage their clients to invest in their community and support one another. 


     What's at the heart of the film is George's redemption. The film, like the Philip Van Doren Stern short story on which it is based, draws heavily from Dicken's A Christmas Carol. Both stories feature a protagonist who is saved by heavenly intervention but, while Ebenezer Scrooge is an unfeeling man, totally absorbed with his own pursuit of wealth, George Bailey consistently makes selfless choices throughout the story. He hardly seems a man in need of a miraculous conversion experience yet in the films climax he is on the brink of suicide and would surely be damned if Clarence Odbody didn't intervene.


     An attentive viewer will not be surprised by this. Throughout the film George displays his dissatisfaction with his state in life. It's worth noting that he displays an acerbic, even cynical attitude towards others, even as a young boy. This is most clearly apparent in the scene where he "proposes" to Mary, treating her attempts to woo him with bitter contempt. When I watched the film last year, I actually concluded that Mr. Potter was right in some sense, that despite all his virtuous acts, George hates his job, hates his life and hates himself. But I don't think this is quite right. 


     Despite his frustrations, George does seem happy through most of the film. He clearly loves his wife and his family and also shows affection for Uncle Billy and for his clients at the Building and Loan. His real fatal flaw, his Achilles heel, is his self-will. Throughout the film George is confronted with conflicts between his own desires and his conscience: when he takes over his father's business instead of going to college, when he continues to run it to allow his brother a lucrative job opportunity, when he spends his honeymoon money to save the building and loan. What he is really facing in each instance is God's will. In each case he make the right choice but in each case he loathes doing so. He feels trapped and embittered. 


     Finally, when confronted with the possibility of prison, George is brought to the breaking point, though even here he opts to take the fall and protect Uncle Billy. He turns to prayer (though, in his own words he's "not a praying man") but, like all worldly men, is focused on his temporal, financial troubles. Clarence shows him how insignificant these things are in the final analysis. Seeing what his town would be like without him, George realizes how much he has accomplished staying at home and choosing against his own desires. He finally recognizes how God's will has shaped his life. 


     His conversion is reminiscent of that holy fool St. Francis, who was struck down on his way to achieve earthly glory in battle, only to find a more lasting glory in self-abasement.  As George runs down his stairway, laughing and carrying his children on his back, to be arrested by the police, one is also reminded of Christian martyrs going to their death with joy and serenity. It's at this moment, when George, having placed himself in God's hands, has rendered himself immune from any earthly misfortune that he is saved from it.


     Confronted with the daunting task of portraying a man's entire life, Capra's script (co-written by Frances Goodrich and Albert Hackett, Jo Swerling, Michael Wilson, and Dorothy Parker) accomplishes this with wonderful economy. It is broken into a series of integral moments from George Bailey's life, each one revolving around a moral decision: whether he should confront Mr. Gower about the poisoned drugs he's made; whether he should take over his father's business or let it be closed down; whether he should marry Mary Hatch, further tying him down; whether he should accept Mr. Potter's job offer, which would help him support his family and allow him a more exciting "important" lifestyle.


     The scene from George's childhood, where we are introduced to his future wife, establishes his worldly ambition, his great admiration for his father and his proclivity to do the right thing. We also see here Capra's uncanny ability to meld drama and comedy. The scene begins innocently enough, with Mary and Violet flirting with a young George Bailey, who boasts of his intentions to be an explorer, but it quickly takes a dark turn as an obviously perturbed Mr. Gower becomes increasingly verbally, and finally physically abusive to George, who has discovered, unbeknownst to the old druggist, that the capsules he's been tasked with delivering are poisoned. This progression from levity to drama can be seen throughout the film: from the slapstick hilarity of the high-school dance to the somber aftermath of Pa Bailey's funeral or from the joyous anticipation of Harry's return as a war hero to the (nearly) tragic climax of the film that feels like something ripped from the Twilight Zone. 


     Franks Capra's direction is truly distinguished. Take, for instance, his use of use of symbolism: in Potter's office we see a rather ostentatious bust of Napoleon and an oversized portrait of himself, symbolizing his sense of self -importance. By contrast, in George's office there is a picture of his father, a man George strives to live up to (sometimes despite himself). There is also the model bridge which he smashes in frustration in the film's climax, symbolizing his frustrated ambitions (recall that he talked of building bridges "a mile long" earlier in the film). Another symbol of George's frustration is the broken knob on the banister, a minor annoyance that seems to emphasize the lack of control he feels.

     Perhaps Capra's greatest strength was his ability to cast actor's well suited for their roles and to get great performances from them. In It's a Wonderful Life he paints a convincing picture of a small-town American community, and the strength of the cast goes a long way to selling that image. The film is filled with experienced character actors and the casting is pitch perfect, from Thomas Mitchell as Uncle Billy to Frank Albertson as Sam Wainwright to Ward Bond as Bert the cop and Frank Faylen as Ernie the taxi driver to Gloria Grahame as the flirtatious Violet. Todd Karns is the embodiment of the all-American boy as Harry Bailey, who seems to attain the fame George so longs for without even trying. Who but the great Lionel Barrymore could have played Mr. Potter? Who could imagine anyone other than Henry Travers as Clarence Odbody? Who would have thought that H. B. Warner (best known for playing Jesus in The King of Kings) would make such a convincing old drunk? I'd be remiss not to mention Beulah Bondi who plays Ma Bailey with affection and (in the alternate reality where George wasn't born) antipathy. Samuel S. Hinds' Pa Bailey, though only appearing briefly, looms large over the whole film. Finally, Bobby Anderson does an admirable job in the unenviable role of the younger George Bailey. 

     Even as a young child I was mesmerized by James Stewart's acting in this film. His career defining performance came at the end of his tour of duty in the Second World War. The actor reportedly felt nervous about stepping behind a camera for the first time in 5 years but you would hardly know this from watching the film. He brings a sense of darkness to the role that audiences hadn't really seen before but also channels the characters innate decency and heroic self-sacrifice. The relative newcomer Donna Reed holds her own as Mary Hatch, whose devotion to George, and stalwart support of him, ultimately lead to his redemption. 

     All of these qualities, the efficiency of the script, the deft hand of Capra behind the camera and the brilliance of the performances, particularly from Stewart and Reed, are on full display in the scenes leading up to and immediately preceding George's marriage. The later scenes serve as a sort of climax for George's rivalry with Potter. George, by using the money he had saved for his honeymoon, is able to prevent his patrons from falling into Potter's hands. It is not insignificant that Mary is the one to suggest this. By participating in his heroic sacrifice she shows herself a companion not just in their marriage but in his work for the community. This is solidified in the following scene where, together, they welcome the Martini's into their new home. 

     The earlier scene is, perhaps, even more crucial. We see George brought to a real crisis as he is drawn by his mother, by his attraction to Mary, and by his circumstances, to stay in Bedford Falls and put down roots, but he rebels against this with every inch of his being. In a wonderfully acted moment between Stewart and Reed, he ultimately gives in, though he resists and protests every step of the way. As C. S. Lewis once observed, "The hardness of God is kinder than the softness of men, and His compulsion is our liberation."

Wednesday, December 29, 2021

Western Wednesdays: North of Hudson Bay (1923)

I haven't posted in forever as I've been super busy with my new job. Christmas break has allowed me some much appreciated free time so. . .

     North of Hudson Bay was released by the Fox Film Corporation on November 18th, 1923. Directed by John Ford, it stars Tom Mix as Michael Dane, a Canadian man who sets out to join his brother when he strikes gold in the Hudson Bay. It is one of two Tom Mix films directed by Ford (the only one to survive).

      North of Hudson Bay is a partially lost film, with 40 of the 50 minutes surviving (that we know of). What remains is watchable, but the ending is rather abrupt. Dane's brother Peter is murdered, and his partner Angus (Will Walling) is framed for this by the real murderer, Cameron McDonald (Frank Campeau). MacDonald runs the local trading post and wants to cheat Peter and Angus out of their gold. His daughter Estelle meets Michael on the way to meet her father and both encounter Angus who has been sentenced to the "Death Trail" where he must wander through the frozen wastes until he dies.

     Micheal tries to protect Angus until he discovers that it's his brother he's accused of having murdered. As he has inherited his brother claim, McDonald tries to swindle and murder Micheal as well, using the same (overly complicated) device he used to murder Angus. Micheal discovers this duplicity and McDonald he is killed in a struggle, but Micheal is accused of his murder. A confused Estelle watches as he and Angus are set off on the Death Trail, now united in their plight. 

      Estelle, who had fallen for Micheal, discovers his innocence and sets off to save him but ends up needing saving herself when McDonald partners try to spirit her away. The climax is, sadly, truncated. It is unclear how Estelle initially escapes her captors and Micheal's rescue of her (as her canoe careens toward a waterfall) is hard to follow. The (extant) ending shows her being saved but cuts out the denouement where they (presumably) make it back to the trading post and embrace.

     John Ford's direction is strong. There is a real sense of atmosphere and occasionally, his usual dose of sentimentally, particularly the opening seen where Micheal bids farewell to his weeping mother. It's a little light on action for a Tom Mix vehicle (Tony isn't featured at all!) but the action there is is fairly well done. Tom fends off a pack of ravenous wolves who have cornered him and Angus in a cavern and his rescue of Estelle (though truncated) looks to have been exciting stuff in the original, completed version of the film. 

     Hopefully this film will be recovered  in its entirety some day but for now lets be grateful we have at least most of it available for public viewing.

Score: 6/10

Sunday, November 7, 2021

Shocktober 2021: Wrap-Up

As usual my brother and I watched a few family friendly films with our younger siblings throughout the month. In addition to Duel, the first two Quiet Place movies (which I've already written about) and A Nightmare Before Christmas (which has become mandatory seasonal viewing at this point) we also watched:

Corpse Bride (2005)

Of the three stop-motion films that Tim Burton has been involved with (he also wrote Nightmare Before Christmas and directed Frankenweenie) Corpse Bride is probably the most conventional in terms of plot. Like Nightmare it hearkens back to the old Rankin/Bass holiday specials. The German setting is reminiscent of Santa Claus Is Comin' to Town in particular. The story also owes a lot to gothic romances. As usual, the director puts his own unique stamp on the film with its macabre visuals and quirky sense of humor. Danny Elfman, with the help of John August, puts in a particularly strong score, filled with memorable songs and clever lyrics. 

Score: 9/10

As always we watched Halloween this years, this time as a double feature with Halloween II, so some updated thoughts on that film are in order: 

Halloween II (1980)

Halloween II is only sequel to feature significant contributions from the three artists most responsible from the success of the original film: John Carpenter and Debra Hill co-wrote the script again, and Carpenter also wrote a new score (with some help from frequent collaborator Alan Howarth). Perhaps most critically, Dean Cundey returned as the films cinematographer. His contribution cannot be underestimated. Not until the 2018 reboot (which apes his style more or less successfully) would the series be able to recapture the visual flair of the first two films (or three if you count the series misfit Season of the Witch). The result is the best Halloween sequel for whatever that's worth.

Score: 7/10

Django the Bastard (1969)

As I've been watching Spaghetti Westerns this year in preparation for next year's (tentatively) Westember III, I decided it would be a good time to check out this western/horror hybrid from Sergio Garrone. While not quite a horror film (the protagonist can never be the source of horror in a genuine horror movie)  does contain a lot of creepy, sepulchre imagery.  Then too, Django has an enigmatic quality that often accompanies horror movie villains (especially in slasher films): it is never made clear if he is mortal. Many spaghetti western heroes have a quasi-supernatural aura about them, but it is much more pronounced here.  The film is a bit plodding at times, and that primitive/low budget quality which is so typical of this genre is both a help and a hindrance, but for the most part this is a really solid and unique entry in the genre.

Score: 8/10

Shocktober 2019 Ranked

Ranked on Flickchart.com

1. The Sixth Sense (1999)

An absolute masterpiece. 

2. The Thing (1982) 

For pure, nail-biting suspense, very few horror films can match John Carpenter's The Thing

3. The Fog (1980) 

An underrated Carpenter film, I’ll always have a soft spot for the The Fog as my introduction to the genre.  

4. The Innocents (1961) 

A superb adaptation of the Henry James The Turn of the Screw

5. Poltergeist (1982) 

It’s a bit bonkers at times, but, for my money, Poltergeist is still the classic haunted house film. 

6. I Married a Witch (1942) 

I’m a sucker for old screwball comedies, and this is a really good one.   

7. A Quiet Place Part II (2020) 

Though not as strong as its predecessor, A Quiet Place Part II wisely keeps its focus on developing the characters and (less successfully) expanding the world of the first film.  

8. The Curse of the Werewolf (1961) 

A great, underappreciated werewolf picture. It may not have the groundbreaking special effects of its Universal counterpart, but it more then makes up for this with it’s sense of atmosphere and mounting terror.   


 9. Duel (1971) 

Speilberg’s first theatrical effort still holds up. Never was an rusty old truck more terrifying.  

10. Corpse Bride (2005)

A strong stop-motion effort from Tim Burton. 

11. Black Sunday (1960)

An impressive debut for Mario Bava. 

12. Constantine (2005) 

Not a great film by any means but I have a soft spot for anything that features Keanu Reeves killing demons with a cross-shaped machine gun that shoots bullets filled with holy water.   

13. Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde (1931)

A film of sharp contrasts, Dr. Jekyll is carried by a strong performance from Fredric March and surprisingly animated direction from Rouben Mamoulian. 

14. The Omen (1976)

Richard Donner’s classic still holds up despite some (occasional) tonal inconsistency. 

15. The Brides of Dracula (1960) 

A rock solid sequel to the film that introduced Christopher Lee’s iconic take on the legendary nosferatu.  

16. The Blob (1988) 

A surprisingly fresh remake, the 1988 version of The Blob is much more dark and violent then the campy 60’s original.  

17. The Conjuring: The Devil Made Me Do It (2021) 

Though easily the least scary of the, now, three film series, The Devil Made Me Do It is still a strong entry and wisely keeps the focus on its characters.  

18. Halloween II (1981) 

Still the best of the many unnecessary Halloween sequels, though that’s not saying much.  

19. The Shadow of the Cat (1961) 

Erratic pacing mars what is otherwise a really unique, well directed horror film. Never was the sight of a cat so unsettling.  

20. Django the Bastard (1969)

The films unique, sepulcher atmosphere is off-sett by its plodding pacing and occasionally sloppiness.

21. The Two Faces of Dr. Jekyll (1960) 

This intriguing (and rather loose) adaptation of the Robert Louis Stevenson classic is held back (for me at least) by its (for the time) excessive raciness.  

 

22. Captain Clegg (aka Night Creatures) (1962) 

A fun, if fairly forgettable Hammer thriller.  

23. The Man Who Could Cheat Death (1959)

An excellent piece of science-fiction horror in the Gothic vein of Hammer’s Frankenstein films, this film would probably be higher on the list if I hadn't seen so many good films this year. 

24. Dead Snow: Red vs. Dead (2014) 

An inventive horror film to be sure, but one that's a little too tasteless for my taste.

25. The Thing (2011) 

Though a vastly inferior prequel, there are enough flashes of inspiration in The Thing to make me curious about the director’s original vision.  

26. The Stranglers of Bombay (1960)

Though not a bad film by any means The Stranglers of Bombay is occasionally dull and the plot is rather contrived in places.  

27. Color Out of Space (2019) 

Though it effectively builds a sense of impending doom and madness, the Color Out of Space is too tonally inconsistent to really be effective.  

28. Prince of Darkness (1987) 

A lesser effort from Carpenter, though it does sustain a really eerie atmosphere, the plot is overly convoluted and the characters thinly drawn.  

29. Damien: Omen II (1978)

The only truly terrible film we watched this time around, the second Omen film is a dreadful bore. 


That about wraps it up for this year. Thanks for reading everyone!